4:9:23
What an image. Every manner of ideological identity, virtue signaling, and cult worship is on display. This is the radical Left’s new militia. Michael Shellenberger, of the Twitter Files, called them the censorship board. Two drag queens in full regalia in the back row. The permanently masked, of course. Even a random little overweight girl, who looks confused (you can never start the mind control too early). A disabled black woman, muzzled. The two people on the Left, occultists? Who even knows who and what they are supposed to represent. The one straight man, white, can be seen almost out of frame. A conscious phasing out of the born-male gender.
That caption on the photo above, “You’re God,” in the left hand corner (zoom in to see), got glitched at the start of the video and stayed onscreen the entire segment. Divine comic intervention or YT interference?
The press statement the photo is from reminds me of this video below when this kind of absurd grouping was meant to be funny. (“The form that is perhaps most appropriate to the weird,” writes Mark Fisher in The Weird and the Eerie, “is montage—the conjoining of two or more things which do not belong together.”).
Maybe the year is 2010?
The Dr. Who lyric: “The triumph of intellect and romance over brute force and cynicism."
Today the doctrine is: “In order to win, they have to force everyone to lie.” Or as Bill Maher put it on Real Time in 2022: “In today’s world, when truth conflicts with narrative, it’s the truth that has to apologize.”
The reason their extremists and shooters don’t get arrested or convicted is every evidence that their “protestors” belong to the Deep State, otherwise the rule of law would apply equally. As would the definition of hate speech and hate crime. As would human rights. Why would such a small community of people (growing by the day now because of social engineering and mind control) be such a top government-sanctioned cause? Completely protected by the law? Because they are the best weapon against every canon, norm, and truth. Because it topples everything and makes way for everything you can imagine. Compare the lie of J6 with the simulated reality of the recent Tennessee capitol trans riot post-school Nashiville shooting, and on and on it goes. The murder of children is not even mentioned by the corporate mainstream press. But what else is new? Is there any group (especially post-COVID) in America, and in the Western world, that is more hated, less protected, than children?
They are teaching us what will happen to us if we don’t blindly and piously obey them. They can say anything, we can say nothing.
Riley Gaines’ (one of the few young women in sports to publicly speak out) story on her attack by radical trans extremists (not all of whom are trans themselves). What is a woman? It’s a man. More specifically, it’s a man telling a woman that he is a real woman and she isn’t. It’s also men telling women that their performance and fetishization of the feminine is male pedagogy. Which is to say, it is state-sanctioned, government-approved misogyny, as it’s always been. It’s also righteous cruelty. Erasure, appropriation, colonization, the kind you can’t do to any other group. It’s religious zealotry and hysteria. It’s the group and groupthink over truth. Women were never allowed to freely speak about their oppression under patriarchy, why should it be any different today, especially now that we don’t need actual women? We’ve advanced beyond them. We have transhumanism and AI. We have the medical industrial complex, we have birthing people and bodies with vaginas. We’re not two sexes, we’re one. The definition and role of women has always belonged to the purview of men. And as I’ve always said, the left and the right agree on this, as the opposite sides of the coin. It’s maybe the only thing they (always) agree on. The faults lies with feminists. Without feminism, women are not able to answer this very important question—a test of compliance—that keeps coming up, What is a woman? A problem men have never had trouble answering, as we learned from Freud and Lacanians like Zizek. But true feminism is not about access to power, or the eradication of the need for men, it is about access to strength and agency, which does not make us omnipotent or autonomous or the same. The point is difference and unity. That’s why I have never understood the right’s total dismissal of all feminism. The left—I know because I was a leftist and feminist all of my life—has never given a shit about feminism (the word was dirty and no one wanted to associate with it, or identify as a feminist, including my colleagues and friends), until literally two minutes ago, when it became a useful Hollywood weapon, one that was engineered to cover up bigger Hollywood crimes, the way Bill Clinton’s scandal (Sex Gate) with Monica Lewinsky covered up the Clinton family’s real crimes and the true role of Epstein and his giant blackmail ring. But what is a woman? If everyone is a woman, if anything is a woman, including above all, men, how can we solve the problem that Hollywood has with men and their supposed monetary and creative supremacy? How can we hold these slippery weasels, who can now identify as whatever they want, accountable? That’s a head scratcher, right?
Want to solve the problem of the exclusion of women? Exclude them completely. Then you won’t have to give them better jobs, acting parts, or salaries.
“There is a problem,” writes Michael Schellenberger, “those urging censorship of ‘misinformation’ are spreading it. Those who condemn ‘extremism’ demand extreme policies. And those who denounce ‘hate’ are filed with loathing for their political enemies.”
Reading this post, you may ask: why is she watching conservative media, like Fox (a network I appeared on in 2018, by the way, to defend my feminist film courses)? Because the corporate media won’t cover these events or ask these questions. Only alt-media will. You have to look for citizen journalists and podcasters to hear this issue discussed rationally. Say whatever you want about Tucker Carlson, during the entire COVID fiasco, he is the only mainstream journalist who had on every single former leftie who got cancelled and decimated for questioning the medical tyranny and mandate narrative (Mark Crispin Miller, Celia Farber, Glenn Greenwald, Noami Wolf, Matt Taibbi, Russell Brand, Ed Dowd, Catherine Austin Fitts, Roseanne Barr, Michael Schellenberger, Ariel Pink, etc), and he always listened to those people and gave them a platform, and respect, unlike the Left, who immediately cancelled anyone who didn’t go along. That meant something to me because I was looking for allies, and had none on my “side.” Compare the public response to the destruction of health sovereignty with the pro-abortion, bodily autonomy argument. One is unacceptable, the other is?
The open hatred and viscousness (I never hear anyone say anything viscous about trans people. They wouldn’t dare) with which these “activists” attack women like JK Rowling, like Posey Parker, Riles Gaines (only a small group of women have spoken out on the trans issue. Early on it was mostly just Germaine Greer. I am reminded too of bell hooks saying, back in 2016, if everything is feminism, there is no feminism. She was right) for defending their experience of womanhood; who are simply sticking up for themselves, their freedom, their rights, their careers, their livelihoods (as if being massacred in their sport by biological men who have obvious biological and physical advantages over them. Today C&C reported that the Biden administration refashioned Title 9: “This is the Biden Administration’s latest response to all the new laws sprouting up in red states prohibiting boys from playing on girls’ teams — the exact reason Title 9 was created in the first place! Instead of promoting ‘women’s sports,’ Title 9 is now being changed to ensure that its original purpose can never be accomplished: all sports will be mens’ sports. Title 9 was originally passed because democrats felt like it was unfair people didn’t enjoy watching girls’ sports as much as mens’ sports.”) has no bearing on their lives and their rights. Their future. Apparently, women are not allowed to speak about their experiences and struggles, their victimization, their bodies, their terms without being terrorized. Anyone who objects or disagrees, or even raises questions about the new dogma, is a vile perpetrator of "hate speech," which is actually great for their cause because it means any annihilation is justified.
Who else has this right to annihilate? Oh, yeah, democrats. That’s what they do best now.
Murder by Decree, 1979
I don’t know when democracy became the suspension of being allowed to think and feel the way one wants to, which is to say: differently. That is not a hate crime. That is not a violation of rights. That is a personal opinion. Something everyone is allowed to have and indulge—it’s called the first amendment. I think we all know what real abuse and persecution looks like. But maybe not. Maybe we’ve lost that too. The oppressors are now the victims.
What is a Woman? She’s the reason you’re here. Call me old fashioned.
