2:9:24 (*Bonus post)

As many probably know from my work (and Time Tells), I’m a sucker for watches and clocks. Tick tock.

Image from Q drop 2647:

Jan 05, 2019 6:19:44 PM EST

The clock is ticking

Follow the watch.

-Q

Via @NewsTreasonMedia (click on the link to see Dave’s montage of images in his Telegram/Twitter post):

He writes: “Bang on 17 seconds into the interview, with @TuckerCarlson and Putin, Putin takes off his black leather watch and placed it on the table next to a pen. Now take a look at Q Drop 2647, from 2019, which has a picture of a black leather watch and a pen. It says: ‘The clock is ticking FOLLOW THE WATCH.’ Is the time relevant? Is it a date…..? Nothing happens by accident….”

My note:

Until the 17 seconds mark, there is no direct shot of Putin. The camera shows him only once he starts removing his watch, a strange thing to suddenly start doing at the beginning of a major interview. Why didn’t he do it before they started filming? And why did he even need to remove his watch at all, unless it was to signal something important? This action is intentional, of course, and meant to be clocked (pun intended). And, as NewsTreasonMedia points out, “It is even more odd that they changed camera angles to show it, rather than edit it out, or have it remain in the same back shot.” Instead, we get a clear shot.

In this clear shot, we see Tucker’s black pen on the table and Putin’s watch, the same combination as Q drop 2647, recreating the 2019 post.

Many on Twitter have also commented on the gematria of the time on the wristwatch—3:14, which equals 17, the number of Q. Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet and the White Hats’ calling card.

More on the meaning of Putin’s watch here.

Second, towards the end of the 2+ hour (2:07:19, which also equals 17. 7+1+9) interview, Tucker has one shoe half-off (both left and right foot at different points). And, again, the camera pans down to show his feet. Having one’s shoes half-off is an unbelievably casual, informal, odd, and inappropriate thing to do during what is arguably the most important and serious interview of our century. Let’s even say tense interview, given the corporate mainstream media’s absolutely hysterical (as in hysteria) response to it. Putin even kept telling Tucker this was a SERIOUS (RUSSIAN) INTERVIEW, not a shallow AMERICAN TALK SHOW, whenever Tucker tried to cut Putin’s long history lesson short. LOL.

What was the message/code of Tucker’s shoes being half-off throughout the interview? CINDERELLA? Waiting for the other show to drop? Relax, the White Hats Alliance have it all under control?

Masha Tupitsyn

I explore film from a deep politics perspective. My DAILY blog offers multi-media posts & screen shot criticism about film, media, culture, literature, philosophy, deep politics, the deep state, COVID, Mkultra, crimes and criminals, the false matrix, free speech, sense-making, the trials of spiritual and emotional autonomy, truth seeker, faith, and love. My daily blog features useful media references, sites, and links.

https://mashatupitsyn.com
Previous
Previous

2:10:24

Next
Next

2:9:24